Council of Europe and CALM publish institutional feedback on Ascendia delivery
Two institutional partners — the Council of Europe and the Congress of Local Authorities of Moldova — published structured feedback on Ascendia's e-learning delivery, with rated assessments across visual design, learner engagement, deadline adherence, and content guidance.
Edited by Gabriel Garban — European Funding & Grants Lead · gabriel.garban@ascendia.eu
Ascendia delivered digitalised institutional learning modules for two public-interest partners: the Council of Europe and the Congress of Local Authorities of Moldova (CALM). Both partners returned formal feedback covering visual design, learner engagement, deadline adherence, content guidance, and overall collaboration.
For the Council of Europe brief, the requirement was a clean, navigable course module. The delivered work was assessed as 5/5 across visual design, learner engagement, deadline adherence, and added value. The Council of Europe project officer Olesea Moghilda recorded that "the visual design makes the content engaging and easy to follow, while interactive elements help learners stay involved and better understand the topic. The course is easy to navigate, making it accessible to everyone."
For CALM, the brief required digitalisation of legal and procedural content. The delivered work was assessed at 5/5 for visual design, deadline adherence, and content guidance, and 4/5 for learner engagement. CALM legal expert Catalina Scorțescu recorded that, after the first module delivery, "I was convinced that I can rely on their professionalism. I appreciate the initiative for improvements of the text and structure of the course."
Catalina Scorțescu added that "the team showed diligence related to all aspects of the course, including content, thus taking responsibility for the quality of the digitalised course as a whole product."
For institutional evaluators, the relevance of this feedback is the consistency of structured ratings across two distinct public-interest deliveries — one for a continental institution, one for a national local-authority congress — and the alignment with the procurement criteria those evaluators typically apply: design quality, delivery discipline, content stewardship, and stable communication.
Evidence and contacts
